I was fortunate enough to taste the following two wines yesterday:

1961 Chateau Batailley: this wine is produced in Pauillac, Bordeaux from 136 acres of cabernet sauvignon, cabernet franc, and merlot. The wine was remarkably fresh and youthful and sediment-free, with a brick-red ruby color and intense aromatics. This was a wine that was excellently balanced and well composed with notes of herbs, redcurrants, spice, kirsch, berry compote, and hints of vanilla. The chateau is a fifth growth by classification and Robert Parker rated the 1961 bottling 84 points, though I think the wine was substantially better.

1994 Philip Togni Cabernet Sauvignon, Napa: Togni is one of those legendary names in California wines. Typically he does not release his wines until 10 years after they are bottled, although that has changed over the last few years. It is a ringer for high-end Bordeaux, which was my initial guess on a blind tasting. I think Parker rates the wine 94-97 points; I thought the wine was superb,  with notes of spice, mint and more black fruit than the ’61 Batailley I tasted right before.

(A word of caution for anyone wishing to navigate the world of zinfandel. Some Californian zinfandels are made by people who think that sweetness, fruit, and alcohol content are virtues in wine and some of the zinfandels I’ve drank have been labeled with alcohol levels as high as 16.9%. Potent stuff. Be careful.)

In the panoply of Californian zinfandel producers, 4 are generally accorded ‘benchmark’ by aficionados: Ridge Vineyards, Rosenblum Cellars, Ravenswood, and Rafanelli. Rosenblum is perhaps most famous, if only by virtue of distribution, as they claim distribution in all 50 states and several other nations. Ravenswood also has attained widespread distribution, and Ridge is also well known and distributed on a smaller scale to most major markets. Rafanelli alone is a small producer, producing one highly desired bottling and nothing else that I am aware of that is distributed.

My experiences with all of these producers has been invariably positive. I think that a 2003 Rafanelli might have been my first experience with a really good zinfandel, though after that I quickly made my way through other well-known bottlings from Limerick Lane, Rombauer, Cline Cellars, etc, etc. My impression of Ravenswood particularly focuses on a recently consumed bottle of their 1992 single vineyard production zinfandel (which vineyard it is escapes my mind, though the wine was superb). In the Columbia market, Ridge probably dominates the higher-end consumption; they produce fewer wines, including one cabernet sauvignon based wine (Monte Bello) that a small but vocal group of aficionados claim is the greatest American wine.

But zinfandel producers of course, are not homogenous. Though it’s my impression that the majority of producers strive for richness and weight in their zinfandels, the grape can produce wines of great finesse and delicacy, though to tease out  those nuances requires substantial skill in both the vineyard and the winery. The reality of zinfandel is that it really is a sensitive, finicky grape, and to produce top quality fruit is difficult.

Rosenblum particularly has chosen to focus on their relationships with roughly 30 vineyard plots from various places around California, from Sonoma to Paso Robles; for people wishing to embark on the slow (and hangover-prone) journey through Californian zinfandel, their bottlings are a good place to start. Winemaker Kent Rosenblum is known for attention to detail and the patience to eschew automated manipulations of their single vineyard wines, favoring balance in his wines. Barrel regimens are usually a blend of oak from America, France, Hungary, Russia, and other places, though the intention with oak is to not leave dominant barrel flavors. In my experience Rosenblum wines have have managed to remain consistently good and reasonably priced (it helps that the winery does not have the heavy mortgage and debt burden that many newer wineries have).

We’ve obtained some 20 cases of the 2006 Rosenblum production; along with several single-vineyard zinfandels we  also have obtained some of their petite sirah and roussane (a white Rhone varietal that is known for its brisk, minerally quality and herbal flavors). If you’re interested in tasting these wines, we’re currently pouring one or two of the single vineyard 2006 zinfandels at the bar this weekend or you can call us at 573-442-2207 for more information about obtaining specific bottlings.

Christine Harbin at Show-Me Daily:

Using the IDEAS web tool, I restricted the selective tax rates on alcoholic beverages for Missouri and Kansas over time, and then exported this information to Excel to produce the following graphs:

Alco Tax Trend Alco Tax vs. Net Migration
Click graphs to enlarge.

Generally, residents of Missouri are taxed less on alcoholic beverages than residents of Kansas are taxed. Specifically, Missouri assesses lower tax rates on wine and beer, but has higher tax rate on spirits.

Paul and I drank the the following wines with pizza from Shakespeare’s today at lunch:

2008 Mt. Nebo Norton: This was presented as a mystery wine but the nose is classic Norton (shoeleather, earth, and brambles). The palate is slim and elegant, without noticeable tannin and a sweetness that holds vanillin and dark fruit.

George Duboeuf 2007 Chateauneuf du Pape: This 2007 Rhone is typical of the vintage: lush, silky, supple, with brambly strawberry and kirsch flavors. Pretty good.

1987 Dunn Vineyards Napa Valley Cabernet Sauvignon: 23 years old and this wine retains freshness and delicacy.13% alcohol. The wine is delicious, with composed flavors of boysenberry, blackberry, and cassis and some vanillin.

1987 Dunn Vineyards Napa Valley Howell Mountain Cabernet Sauvignon: I think of the 4 people drinking this wine, I alone preferred the single vineyard Dunn Howell Mountain production to the regular Napa bottling (above). It had a bit more ‘stuffing’ and weight than the Napa bottling. 13% alcohol.

That’s the title of a series of books about the wine dogs of Australia, or more descriptively, the dogs who make their home in the numerous wineries and tasting rooms of Australia. The book is the brainchild of designer Craig McGill and Susan Elliott, who got the idea while drinking in Barossa Valley in the late 1990′s. Dogs featured include Hannas, from Torbreck, Brandy, from de Bortoli, and Rose Marie, from Noon Winery.

Highly recommended for dog and wine lovers alike.

125 months screwcap

125 Months After Bottling

These bottles are all 1999 Clare Valley Semillon made by Kerri Thompson of Leasingham Estate. The bottles were part of an experiment conducted by the Australian Wine Research Institute and were sealed with various natural and synthetic cork closures, with the exclusion of the bottle sealed with a screwcap (far left).

Sensory evaluation confirms our visual intuition: the screw-cap sealed bottle retained its freshness and prevented oxidation far better than any other kind of closure. UK wine journalist Jamie Goode tasted the wine and reports on it here:

So, some 10 years and eight months after bottling, how does this wine look? It’s a full yellow colour, with a minerally, flinty edge to the attractive honeysuckle and citrus fruit nose. The palate has a lovely focused fruit quality to it with pithy citrus fruit and a hint of grapefruit. There are also some subtle toasty notes. Very attractive and amazingly fresh for a 10 year old Clare Semillon.
These results are important because they tell us two things. First, screwcaps work very well when you’re trying to age wine. Second, Australian whites wines have staying power and longevity when bottled and stored correctly.

Over the course of the last couple years, I’ve tasted several great bottles of cabernet sauvignon and shiraz from Shirvington, a producer in McLaren Vale, South Australia. A brief historical note: the winery was founded by a couple named Shirvington, who found some absolutely fantastic vineyard land and hired Sparky Marquis to make their wines. Kim Johnston is the winemaker for the 2005 and successive vintages.

Most famously, Shirvington’s 2002 shiraz received incredible publicity after American wine critic Robert Parker scored it 99 points. In more recent vintages, Parker has scored the wines in the more modest 92-96 point range. I am not aware of any wine critic who has consistently rated these wines besides Parker, but my impressions have been on par with his tasting notes.

Over the past year or so I’ve tasted the 2004 and 2005 Shirvington cabernet sauvignon and the 2003 and 2004 Shirvington shiraz. While high in alcohol, these wines are well defined, and the alcoholic nature of the wines does not intrude upon the flavor elements. The wines are sweet and dense, and the fruit component so rich that often the oak treatment (and the vanillin and spice flavors one gets from oak) is overwhelmed. Over the last 6-4 years tannin has generally dropped out, leaving these wines with a texture that is silky and gorgeous. The grapes are all from Shirvington’s single vineyard sites that are high in red clay and limestone; despite their youth (I believe the first plantings were in 1995)

I will note that these bottles are wines best consumed with friends, in small portions. They are very alcoholic, and for those used to drinking wines that are no more than 14% alcohol, these wines with their extra 1%-1.5% of alcohol do make a difference over the course of even a few glasses. But they are tremendous, and drinking well now in their maturity.

If you are interested in what inventory we still have of these wines (which is not much) we do still have a small amount of 2003, 2004, and 2005 Shirvington shiraz and cabernet sauvignon. For specific pricing and delivery, you can email toptenwines@socket.net or call us at 573-442-2207.

Haven’t pitched this in a while, but you can follow us on twitter at @TopTenWines.

From Physorg:

In their leading research, Jones and colleagues found that radioactive carbon dioxide produced from atomic bomb tests in the atmosphere absorbed by grapes can be used to accurately determine wine vintages. The new technique is similar to radio-carbon dating, used for years to estimate the age of prehistoric objects. It works by comparing the amount of carbon-14 (C-14), a less common form of atmospheric carbon, to carbon-12 (C-12), which is more stable and abundant. The ratio of these two carbon forms, or isotopes, has remained constant in the atmosphere for thousands of years. Read the rest of this entry »

I haven’t posted a tasting note recently, but I did get to try a fresh bottle of 2007 Perrin Cotes-du-Rhone Villages Rouge, a sturdy, well-known Cotes-du-Rhone that receives somewhat wide international distribution. Typical of the vintage, the wine was rich and supple, with robust flavors of blackberry and plum along with hints of cocoa, cinnamon, and spice. For an inexpensive Rhone <$20, this is excellent. Drink immediately, though this wine could benefit from up to five years in a nice cool cellar.

Click here to get our posts about wine in your email!

Join 9 other followers

Follow us on Twitter:

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 9 other followers

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.